Sutter was right to be unhappy when Marshall first discovered gold.؟
إجابة الطالب المختصرة من خلال موقع بوابة الإجابات هي
خطأ
John Sutter's reaction to the discovery of gold by James Marshall at Sutter's Mill is a complex one, and whether he was "right" to be unhappy is a matter of interpretation. Here's a breakdown of why Sutter was unhappy and arguments for both sides:
**Why Sutter Was Unhappy:**
* **Loss of Control:** Sutter had grand plans for his vast land holdings, including agriculture and industry. The gold discovery completely disrupted these plans. He lost control of his workforce, as men abandoned their jobs to seek gold.
* **Trespassing and Squatting:** The discovery triggered the California Gold Rush. Thousands of people flooded onto Sutter's land without permission, squatting, mining, and destroying his property. He had no legal recourse to stop them effectively.
* **Financial Ruin:** Despite owning the land where gold was found, Sutter did not profit significantly from the Gold Rush. Instead, he was overwhelmed by lawsuits, debts, and the destruction of his assets. He spent years in legal battles trying to regain control of his land and businesses, ultimately without success.
* **Destruction of His Vision:** Sutter's vision of a self-sufficient agricultural empire was shattered. His utopian dream was replaced by chaos and greed.
**Arguments for Sutter Being "Right" to Be Unhappy:**
* **Unintended Consequences:** Sutter's unhappiness was a natural reaction to the devastation of his life's work and the loss of his property. It's understandable that he would feel betrayed by fate.
* **Justified Concern:** Given what ultimately happened to him, his initial concerns about the discovery were justified. He foresaw the potential for chaos and loss, and his fears were realized.
* **Violation of Property Rights:** His land was invaded, and his property destroyed without compensation. Anyone in a similar situation would likely be unhappy.
**Arguments Against Sutter Being "Right" to Be Unhappy (or at least, a more nuanced perspective):**
* **Inevitable Progress (maybe):** Some might argue that the Gold Rush, despite its negative impacts on Sutter, was an inevitable historical event that spurred growth and development in California.
* **Greed and Opportunity:** While Sutter suffered, others prospered immensely. Some might argue that he should have adapted to the new reality and found a way to capitalize on the Gold Rush, rather than resist it. However, this would be a difficult adaptation. He did not have the resources to compete with the thousands of other miners.
* **Historical Perspective:** Hindsight is 20/20. It's easy to judge Sutter's reaction in retrospect, knowing the full extent of the Gold Rush's impact. At the time, he may not have fully grasped the scale of what was to come, but his initial anxiety proved prophetic.
**Conclusion:**
Ultimately, there's no simple answer. Sutter's unhappiness was a complex reaction to a situation that drastically altered his life and the course of California history. While some might argue that he should have adapted or that the Gold Rush was an inevitable force, his initial concerns and subsequent suffering were justified and understandable. It is a tragedy that he was not able to capitalize on the gold rush and was, instead, ruined by it.
اذا كان لديك إجابة افضل او هناك خطأ في الإجابة علي سؤال Sutter was right to be unhappy when Marshall first discovered gold. اترك تعليق فورآ.
